Skip Navigation
  • Home
  • About Us
  • National sites
  • Myacca
  • Blogs
  • ACCA Discuss
  • ACCA.TV
  • Podcasts
  • Accamail
ACCA - the global body for professional accountants


Advanced search
  • Join Us
  • Students & Affiliates
  • Members
  • Employers
  • Learning Providers
  • General Public
ACCA Homepage < ACCA UK < UK members < Technical Advisory < Technical advice and support < Tax < Tax cases < Corporation tax cases
  • Income tax cases
  • Corporation tax cases
  • OWEN v SOUTHERN RAILWAY OF PERU LTD
  • HOLDEN v WOOD & WOOD
  • GORDON & BLAIR v CIR
  • IMPERIAL CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES v COLMER
  • ROLLS-ROYCE MOTORS LTD v BAMFORD
  • FALMER JEANS LTD v RODIN
  • JOWETT v O’NEILL & BRENNAN CONSTRUCTION LTD
  • MURRAY v IMPERIAL CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES LTD
  • ALLUM & ALLUM v MARSH
  • Ferriby Construction (UK) Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2007] UKSPC SPC00635
  • KELSALL v INVESTMENT CHARTWORK LTD
  • HERBERT SMITH v HONOUR
  • Income shifting cases
  • IR35 tax cases
  • Business tax cases
  • Capital allowances cases
  • Capital gains tax cases
  • VAT cases
  • Inheritance tax cases
  • Tax Administration and Key Principles

top stories

  • Your PER questions answered Your PER questions answered - opens in a new window
  • ACCA moves online ACCA moves online - opens in a new window
  • Reminder as self-assessment deadline Reminder as self-assessment deadline - opens in a new window
  • Young need better jobs advice, says ACCA Young need better jobs advice, says ACCA - opens in a new window


  • See more news more
    See global news more
Send
Print
Share

Ferriby Construction (UK) Ltd v Revenue & Customs [2007] UKSPC SPC00635

This is an interesting and important case, which highlights the importance of proper record-keeping.

The taxpayer company submitted a corporation tax return which showed a profit of £20,000, which the company admitted to be an estimate.  Some months later the company submitted an amended return, claiming that it made a loss of £70,000.  The reason given in a covering letter for the submission of the original estimated figures was that during the financial year, the company suffered data loss and had to reconstruct the actual figures, although the explanations given surrounding the data loss were somewhat incogent.

HMRC opened an investigation and found that the company’s records were insufficient to support the claimed loss of £70,000. HMRC amended the self-assessment to show once again a profit of £20,000.
 
HELD: The Special Commissioners dismissed the appeal. The company was unable to substantiate its claim to have made a loss and, likewise, were insufficient to displace HMRC’s assessment of £20,000.  In the absence of any better information HMRC was entitled to amend the self-assessment to show a profit of £20,000 as estimated by the company.

Back to top

 
  • Contact us
  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Accessibility
  • Advertising
  • Site map
© 2010 ACCA