Skip Navigation
  • Home
  • About Us
  • National sites
  • Myacca
  • Blogs
  • ACCA Discuss
  • ACCA.TV
  • Podcasts
  • Accamail
ACCA - the global body for professional accountants


Advanced search
  • Join Us
  • Students & Affiliates
  • Members
  • Employers
  • Learning Providers
  • General Public
ACCA Homepage < ACCA UK < UK members < Technical Advisory < Technical advice and support < Tax < Tax cases < Business tax cases
  • Income tax cases
  • Corporation tax cases
  • Business tax cases
  • G Bushell v HMRC
  • The Upper and First-Tier Tribunals – What is a Reasonable excuse?
  • Ready Mixed Concrete (South East) Ltd v Minister of Pensions and National Insurance
  • Auf Wiedersehen HMRC
  • Birmingham & District Cattle By-Products Ltd v CIR KB 1919 12 TC 92
  • Caillebotte v Quinn Ch D 1975 50 TC 222 [1975] STC 265 [1975] 1 WLR 731 [1975] 2 All ER 412
  • Cape Brandy Syndicate v CIR CA 1921 12 TC 358 [1921] 2 KB 403
  • Cormac Construction Ltd v R & C Commissioners
  • Creed v H & M Levinson Ltd Ch D 1981 54 TC 477 [1981] STC 486
  • Curtis v J & B Oldfield Ltd KB 1925 9 TC 319
  • Demibourne Ltd v HMRC Sp C [2005] SSCD 667 (Sp C 486)
  • Dollar & Dollar v Lyon Ch D 1981 54 TC 459 [1981] STC 333
  • Gallagher v Jones CA 1993 66 TC 77 [1993] STC 537 [1994] 2 WLR 160 [1994] Ch 107
  • Horton v Young CA 1971 47 TC 60 [1972] Ch 157 164 [1971] 3 All ER 412
  • Income shifting cases
  • IR35 tax cases
  • Jackson v Laskers Home Furnishers Ltd Ch D 1956 37 TC 69 [1957] 1 WLR 69 [1956] 3 All ER 891
  • Kirkby v Hughes Ch D 1992 65 TC 532 [1993] STC 76
  • Leach v Pogson Ch D 1962 40 TC 585
  • Mallalieu v Drummond HL 1983 57 TC 330 [1983] STC 665 [1983] 2 WLR 409 [1983] 2 All ER 1095
  • Marson v Morton Ch D 1986 59 TC 381 [1986] STC 463 [1986] 1 WLR 1343
  • McGowan v Brown & Cousins (t/a Stuart Edwards) Ch D 1977 2 TC 8 [1977] STC 342 [1977] 1 WLR 1403 [1977] 3 All ER 844
  • Murray v Goodhews CA 1977 52 TC 86 [1978] STC 207 [1978] WLR 499 [1978] 2 All ER 40
  • Newsom v Robertson CA 1952 33 TC 452 [1953] 1 Ch 7 [1952] 2 All ER 728
  • Badges of trade
  • Parade Park Hotel and Another v HMRC P May v HMRC Sp C [2007] SSCD 430 (Sp C 599)
  • Pickford v Quirke CA 1927 13 TC 251
  • Rowland v HMRC
  • Taylor v Good CA 1974 49 TC 277 [1974] STC 148 [1974] 1 WLR 556 [1974] 1 All ER 1137
  • Rutledge v CIR CS 1929 14 TC 490
  • Salt v Chamberlain Ch D 1979 53 TC 143 [1979] STC 750
  • Sargent v Barnes Ch D 1978 52 TC 335 [1978] STC 322 [1978] 1 WLR 823 [1978 2 All ER 737
  • Wannell v Rothwell Ch D 1996 68 TC 719 [1996] STC 450
  • Sharkey v Wernher HL 1955 36 TC 275 [1956] AC 58 [1955] 3 All ER 493
  • Simpson v John Reynolds & Co (Insurances) Ltd CA 1975 49 TC 693 [1975] STC 271 [1975] 1 WLR 617 [1975] 2 All ER 88
  • Smiths Potato Estates Ltd v Bolland HL 1948 30 TC 267 [1948] AC 508 [1948] 2 All ER 367
  • Tucker v Granada Motorway Services Ltd HL 1979 53 TC 92 [1979] STC 393 [1979] 1 WLR 683 [1979] 2 All ER 801
  • Wisdom v Chamberlain CA 1968 45 TC 92 [1969] 1 WLR 275 [1969] 1 All ER 332
  • James Snook & Co Ltd v Blasdale CA 1952 33 TC 244
  • Capital allowances cases
  • Capital gains tax cases
  • VAT cases
  • Inheritance tax cases
  • Tax Administration and Key Principles

top stories

  • Your PER questions answered Your PER questions answered - opens in a new window
  • ACCA moves online ACCA moves online - opens in a new window
  • Reminder as self-assessment deadline Reminder as self-assessment deadline - opens in a new window
  • Young need better jobs advice, says ACCA Young need better jobs advice, says ACCA - opens in a new window


  • See more news more
    See global news more
Send
Print
Share

Sharkey v Wernher HL 1955 36 TC 275 [1956] AC 58 [1955] 3 All ER 493

A taxpayer operated a stud farm that was an accepted trade.  The taxpayer also trained and raced horses that was regarded as a hobby and therefore not liable to tax.  five horses were transferred from the stud farm to the racing stables when the market value considerably exceeded the breeding costs.  It was held that as the disposal of the horses was in the course of the business the market value should be used and not its cost.  The case established the principle if trading stock is disposed of other then in the course of ordinary trade the market value at the date of disposal should be used.

For commentary on challenging Sharkey v Wernher, please click here

Back to top

 
  • Contact us
  • Terms
  • Privacy
  • Accessibility
  • Advertising
  • Site map
© 2010 ACCA